Washington just signaled a harder line against cartel-terror networks—potentially reaching actors tied to Maduro—by unlocking terrorism authorities that bite far deeper than past slap-on-the-wrist approaches.

Story Snapshot

• The State Department is applying terrorism designations to criminal groups to unlock tougher tools like asset freezes and material-support prosecutions.
• Secretary Marco Rubio says the U.S. will use “all its power” after recent designations, contrasting prior treatment of cartels as “local street gangs.”
• A July 18 designation shows the policy is active; more actions may follow, including toward networks linked to Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro.
• Experts note SDGT sanctions can persist even if FTO status shifts, preserving long-term leverage.

Rubio’s pledge: use all available counterterrorism tools

Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated in an Aug. 7 broadcast that after designating several criminal organizations as terrorist entities—including one linked to Nicolás Maduro—the United States will “use all its power to eradicate them.” He framed this as a course correction from prior years that treated transnational cartels like neighborhood gangs rather than national security threats. His remarks reflect the administration’s six-month push to reclassify violent criminal networks under established terrorism authorities.

Terrorist Designation of Cartels Gives US New Power to Target Maduro-Linked Groups: Rubio https://t.co/OECRDf0zSg

— Randy S MAGA. (@RandyRazor1972) August 10, 2025

Rubio’s comments align with a broader 2025 posture to apply the government’s terrorism toolkit—Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) authorities—against cartels and allied facilitators. This reclassification moves beyond rhetoric: the State Department’s July activity included a terrorist designation, signaling operational use of these powers. The approach aims to accelerate asset freezes, restrict travel and immigration benefits, and enable material-support prosecutions that were harder to pursue when cartels were treated as ordinary criminal enterprises.

Watch a report:

What terrorism designations change in practice

FTO and SDGT designations carry distinct but complementary teeth: FTO status under immigration law triggers criminal penalties for material support, while SDGT sanctions under Executive Order 13224 freeze property and cut off access to the U.S. financial system. Secretaries of State have wide discretion to designate or delist groups, yet SDGT status often endures even if an FTO label later changes—maintaining pressure and leverage on networks, financiers, and logistics nodes intertwined with cartel-terror ecosystems.

These authorities matter for conservative priorities: financial isolation limits cartel revenue streams fueling cross-border crime, while material-support cases empower prosecutors to hit enablers, not just triggermen. Visa restrictions and watchlisting harden the border without new legislation, responding to long-standing concerns about illegal immigration pipelines exploited by transnational criminal organizations. Banks, shippers, and crypto platforms face heightened compliance, raising the costs of doing business with tainted counterparties and shrinking safe havens for dirty money.

July actions show the policy turning point

The July 18 designation of The Resistance Front illustrates that this is not theoretical; the State Department used terrorism authorities in mid-2025. That action, combined with Rubio’s late-July media outreach, set the stage for the August declaration that Washington will treat criminal syndicates like terrorists when they meet the legal criteria. While specific details on the Venezuela-linked group remain undisclosed in public postings, the administration’s posture suggests more designations are possible as packages clear interagency review.

Diplomatic friction with Caracas may intensify if entities tied to Maduro’s orbit land on U.S. terror lists. Allies could face secondary effects if their firms transact with designated actors, prompting broader alignment of sanctions and intelligence-sharing. For readers focused on sovereignty and law-and-order, the near-term bottom line is simple: the U.S. is escalating consequences for networks that traffic violence, people, and fentanyl across our border.

Risks, limits, and what to watch next

Courts and partners will test the boundaries of applying counterterrorism frameworks to cartels, raising questions about evidentiary thresholds and due process. Expect expanded visa bans, intensified financial targeting, and closer cooperation with regional partners that want U.S. support against cross-border crime—while adversarial regimes attempt propaganda pushback. Watch State and Treasury channels for new entries that name facilitators, financial cutouts, and state-linked enablers.

Sources:

Trump Administration’s Delisting of HTS? Not Quite: The Secretary of State’s Discretion on Foreign Terrorist Organization Designations and Delistings
Terrorist Designation of The Resistance Front
Executive and Regulatory Actions of the Trump Administration
Secretary of State Marco Rubio With Brian Kilmeade of Fox Radio
Secretary of State Marco Rubio